S&P 500 7,722.60 +0.60%
Nasdaq 26,477.81 +1.18%
S&P/TSX 36,171.49 +0.63%
Apple 347.10 +0.93%
Nvidia 217.94 +0.90%
Microsoft 531.33 −0.24%
Shopify 232.93 −1.27%
Royal Bank 285.46 +0.42%
CAD/USD 0.7117 −0.27%
AFTER HRS · 19:50 ET
Market ClerkRecap
Tue Oct 27 · after hours3 signals today140 insider buys this week · $73.9MCIRO short report next: Oct 31The week ahead

DSP

Viant Technology Inc.
NASDAQ · TECHNOLOGY · SERVICES-COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, DATA PROCESSING, ETC.
14.13
+0.31 +2.24%
USD · close Oct 27

A free account adds a watchlist, alerts when insiders, Congress or short sellers move on your tickers, and a morning brief. Sign up

MKT CAP —P/E 39.3DIV YIELD —FCF YIELD —REV TTM $388.5M +22.0%NET INCOME $8.7M +269.0%NET CASH $193.1M52W 8.50 – 14.13NEXT EARNINGS Nov 9SEC XBRL · TTM TO Invalid Date

How DSP rewrote its risk factors

10-K ITEM 1A · FY2024 → FY2025
Text kept
73%
of sentences unchanged
Added
117
new sentences
Dropped
111
sentences removed
Length
−12
words, now 25,307

New in FY2025

  • In addition, as we develop and introduce new products and services, including those incorporating or utilizing AI and machine learning and new processing of information, they may raise new, or heighten existing, technological, security, legal and other risks and challenges, that may cause unintended consequences and may not function properly or may be misused by our customers.
  • As the market for programmatic buying for advertising matures, growth in spend may outpace growth in our revenue due to a number of factors, including pricing competition, volume discounts and shifts in media, customer and channel mix, and the composition of offerings provided to our customers.
  • We do not have exclusive relationships with advertising agencies, and we depend on agencies to work with us as they embark on advertising campaigns for their customers.
  • We have in the past lost and could in the future lose revenue from marketers that switch from an agency that utilizes our platform to one that does not.
  • In addition, some advertising agencies have strong relationships with competing ad platforms or other platforms and may direct their marketers to such other platforms.
  • We are primarily focused on the U.S. market, while competing ad platforms may be focused on international markets.
  • Advertising agencies who seek both domestic and international services, or otherwise limit the number or types of ad platforms used, may choose to consolidate with competing ad platforms.
  • The effects of macroeconomic conditions and geopolitical events, such as inflation, tariffs, changes in trade policies, international conflict, high interest rates and other adverse market events have had, and could in the future have, an adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition.
  • Our business and operations have been and could in the future be adversely affected by macroeconomic conditions and geopolitical events, such as bank failures, high interest rates, inflationary pressures, tariffs, changes in trade policies, labor shortages, shortages of goods and services, supply chain constraints, pandemics, political cycles, changes in laws and interpretations of laws, and potential disruptions from international conflicts and acts of terrorism.
  • Our customers’ and potential customers’ businesses or cash flows have recently been and may continue to be negatively impacted by the economic uncertainty related to, among other things, pandemics, bank failures, inflation and monetary supply shifts, labor shortages, supply disruptions, tariffs, tightening of credit markets, political cycles, changes in laws and interpretations of laws, changes in the volume and relative mix of U.S. government spending, cost-cutting and efficiency initiatives, and potential disruptions from international conflicts and acts of terrorism, which has led and may continue to lead them to reduce their advertising spending and delay their advertising initiatives or technology spending, or attempt to renegotiate contracts and obtain concessions, which may materially and negatively impact our business, operating results and financial condition.
  • Typically, we are contractually required to pay advertising inventory and data suppliers within a negotiated period of time, regardless of whether our customers pay us on time, or at all, and we may not be able to negotiate better terms.
  • For example, suppliers may place restrictions on the use of their inventory, including prohibiting the placement of advertisements on behalf of specific marketers, or seek to sell inventory directly to a marketer or advertising agency instead of, or in addition to, a demand side platform.
  • Although television advertising is a large market, the majority of it is not currently purchased programmatically.
  • If our access to data is diminished, the effectiveness of our platform would be decreased, which could harm our operating results and financial condition.
  • For example, states increasingly require companies like ours to honor requests to opt out of certain advertising related uses and disclosures of Personal Information through browser-or device-based mechanisms and California will soon require data brokers to honor deletion requests made through a centralized mechanism, both of which increase our compliance costs, materially increase potential penalties for non-compliance, and potentially limit the availability of data on our platform.
  • This could impact our business and diminish our revenue.
  • If we were to lose access to significant amounts of the data or the compliance obligations for our suppliers or us become too onerous, our ability to provide products and services to our customers could be materially and adversely impacted, which could be materially adverse to our business, operating results and financial condition.
  • We had approximately 380 employees as of December 31, 2025.
  • We contractually prohibit the misuse of our platform by agencies (and their marketer customers).
  • In addition, we may terminate MSAs or IOs in the event customers violate our ad policies or other contract terms, which could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
  • Acquisitions involve numerous other risks, any of which could harm our business, including: • regulatory hurdles; • failure of anticipated benefits to materialize; • diversion of management time and focus from operating our business to addressing acquisition integration challenges; • retention of employees from the acquired company; • cultural challenges associated with integrating employees from the acquired company into our organization; • integration of the acquired company’s accounting, management information, human resources and other administrative and information technology systems; • integration of the acquired company's products and technology; • the need to implement or improve controls, procedures and policies at a business that prior to the acquisition may have lacked effective controls, procedures and policies; • coordination of product development and sales and marketing functions; • liability for activities of the acquired company before the acquisition, including known and unknown liabilities; • litigation or other claims in connection with the acquired company, including claims from terminated employees, former stockholders or other third parties; and • negative reception to an acquisition by customers, suppliers, vendors, or investors.
  • In addition, changes in immigration law may increase competition and increase costs associated with recruiting personnel.
  • We face significant competition in these channels and others, such as streaming audio and digital out-of-home, which we expect will intensify in the future.
  • Risks Related to Data Privacy and Artificial Intelligence We are subject to stringent and changing legal obligations related to data privacy and security.
  • Our actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could lead to regulatory investigations or actions, litigation (including class action claims) and mass arbitration demands, litigation and regulatory defense costs, fines and penalties, disruptions of our business operations, reputational harm, loss of customers or sales, revenue declines, increase the cost of data, reduce the availability of data, reduce our ability to utilize or disclose data, and have adverse effects on the demand for our products and services or other adverse business consequences.
  • U.S. federal, state, and local governments, and foreign governments have adopted or proposed numerous laws relating to the Processing of Personal Information relating to individuals and households, including contact information and pseudonymous identifiers, many with a particular focus on marketing and advertising uses of such Personal Information.
  • Regulators could allege that our practices do not comply with such laws or regulations, despite our ongoing efforts to comply.
  • These enforcement actions may signal increased ongoing regulatory scrutiny of advertising practices, particularly those that involve “sensitive” categories of personal data such as health data, data related to children and teens, and precise location information.
  • The FTC could expand this focus by acting on new authority to enforce a federal law focused on disclosures of certain information it classifies as sensitive to certain restricted countries or entities under the control of such countries.
  • Certain State Privacy Laws also require or will require companies to respond to user-enabled opt out preference signals or "global privacy controls," such as those expressed through a browser plug-in or privacy setting, device setting, or other mechanisms, that communicate or signal the consumer’s choice to opt-out of the sale or sharing of their Personal Information, or the use of their Personal Information for targeted advertising.
  • Lawmakers and regulators are also focused on data Processing by companies that do not have direct relationships with the consumers whose Personal Information they sell or share.
  • Several states, including California, Oregon and Texas, have enacted or updated laws restricting the activities of data brokers.
  • Beyond additional transparency requirements, beginning in August 2026, companies registered as data brokers in California will be required to honor deletion requests expressed by California residents through a centralized mechanism the state will create.
  • Beginning in 2028, data brokers will be required to undergo audits verifying their compliance with the Delete Act.
  • These obligations may reduce the data available to Viant, require us to develop complex and expensive compliance tools and procedures, and may result in reductions in revenue.
  • Lawmakers, regulators, and advocates also continue to focus on activities involving the use of certain types of Personal Information perceived as especially sensitive, such as children’s and teen's data, health data, and location data, which will continue to impact the advertising industry.
  • Related to health information, the Washington state My Health My Data Act ("MHMD") introduced a host of new requirements covering a very broadly defined notion of consumer health data, including obligations on disclosures of such data that will impact the advertising industry.
  • Other states (e.g., Nevada) have enacted similar laws (though without a private right of action), and we expect more states will follow.
  • Additionally, plaintiffs have sought to apply decades-old statutes, including federal wiretap and similar laws and the Video Privacy Protection Act to certain advertising and online tracking practices.
  • Such laws, which include private causes of action, can be costly to settle or litigate, regardless of the merit of the claim, and may result in significant monetary liability.

and 77 more.

Gone since FY2024

  • In addition, as we develop and introduce new products and services, including those incorporating or utilizing AI and machine learning and new processing of information, they may raise new, or heighten existing, technological, security, legal and other risks and challenges, that may cause unintended consequences and may not function properly or may be misused by our clients.
  • Furthermore, if our channel mix changes due to a shift in customer demand, such as customers shifting their usage more quickly or more extensively than expected to channels in which we have relatively less functionality, features or inventory, then demand for our platform could decrease, and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
  • As the market for programmatic buying for advertising matures, growth in spend may outpace growth in our revenue due to a number of factors, including pricing competition, volume discounts and shifts in media, client and channel mix, and the composition of offerings provided to our clients.
  • We do not have exclusive relationships with advertising agencies, and we depend on agencies to work with us as they embark on advertising campaigns for their clients.
  • If a marketer switches from an agency that utilizes our platform to one that does not, we could lose revenue from that marketer.
  • In addition, some advertising agencies have strong relationships with competing DSPs or other platforms and may direct their marketers to such other platforms.
  • We are primarily focused on the U.S. market, while competing DSPs may be focused on international markets.
  • Advertising agencies who seek both domestic and international services, or otherwise limit the number or types of DSPs used, may choose to consolidate with competing DSPs.
  • The effects of macroeconomic conditions and geopolitical events, such as inflation, high interest rates and other adverse market events have had, and could in the future have, an adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition.
  • Our business and operations have been and could in the future be adversely affected by macroeconomic conditions and geopolitical events, such as bank failures, high interest rates, inflationary pressures, labor shortages, shortages of goods and services, supply chain constraints, pandemics, political election cycles, changes in laws and interpretations of laws, and potential disruptions from international conflicts and acts of terrorism.
  • Our customers’ and potential customers’ businesses or cash flows have recently been and may continue to be negatively impacted by the economic uncertainty related to, among other things, pandemics, bank failures, inflation and monetary supply shifts, labor shortages, supply disruptions, tariffs, tightening of credit markets, political election cycles, changes in laws and interpretations of laws, changes in the volume and relative mix of U.S. government spending, cost-cutting and efficiency initiatives, and potential disruptions from international conflicts and acts of terrorism, which has led and may continue to lead them to reduce their advertising spending and delay their advertising initiatives or technology spending, or attempt to renegotiate contracts and obtain concessions, which may materially and negatively impact our business, operating results and financial condition.
  • Typically, we are contractually required to pay advertising inventory and data suppliers within a negotiated period of time, regardless of whether our customers pay us on time, or at all, and we may not be able to renegotiate better terms.
  • For example, suppliers may place restrictions on the use of their inventory, including prohibiting the placement of advertisements on behalf of specific marketers, or seek to sell inventory directly to a marketer or advertising agency instead of, or in addition to, a DSP.
  • Although television advertising is a large market, only a relatively small percentage of it is currently purchased programmatically.
  • If our access to data related to our Household ID is diminished, the effectiveness of our platform would be decreased, which could harm our operating results and financial condition.
  • For example, in California, lawmakers have introduced requirements to honor requests submitted through a universal deletion mechanism that the state would develop and materially increase penalties for non-compliance.
  • We and our suppliers may face compliance risks under these laws and limitations on our ability to use certain data, including data provided by our third-party suppliers, which could impact our business and diminish our revenue.
  • If we were to lose access to significant amounts of the data that enables our Household ID ("HHID") framework, or the compliance obligations for our suppliers or us become too onerous, our ability to provide products and services to our customers could be materially and adversely impacted, which could be materially adverse to our business, operating results and financial condition.
  • We had approximately 376 employees as of December 31, 2024.
  • We contractually prohibit the misuse of our platform by agencies (and their marketer customers) and inventory suppliers.
  • In addition, we may terminate MSAs or IOs in the event clients violate our ad policies or other contract terms, which could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
  • Acquisitions involve numerous other risks, any of which could harm our business, including: • regulatory hurdles; • failure of anticipated benefits to materialize; • diversion of management time and focus from operating our business to addressing acquisition integration challenges; • retention of employees from the acquired company; • cultural challenges associated with integrating employees from the acquired company into our organization; • integration of the acquired company’s accounting, management information, human resources and other administrative and information technology systems; • integration of the acquired company's products and technology; • the need to implement or improve controls, procedures and policies at a business that prior to the acquisition may have lacked effective controls, procedures and policies; • coordination of product development and sales and marketing functions; • liability for activities of the acquired company before the acquisition, including known and unknown liabilities; • litigation or other claims in connection with the acquired company, including claims from terminated employees, former stockholders or other third parties; and • negative reception to an acquisition by clients, suppliers, vendors, or investors.
  • We face significant competition in these channels and others, such as streaming audio and digital billboards, which we expect will intensify in the future.
  • Risks Related to Data Privacy and Artificial Intelligence We are subject to stringent and changing obligations related to data privacy and security.
  • Our actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could lead to regulatory investigations or actions, litigation (including class action claims) and mass arbitration demands, fines and penalties, disruptions of our business operations, reputational harm, loss of customers or sales, revenue declines, increase the cost of data, reduce the availability of data, reduce our ability to utilize or disclose data, adverse effects on the demand for our products and services, or other adverse business consequences.
  • U.S. federal, state, and local governments, and foreign governments have adopted or proposed numerous laws relating to the Processing of Personal Information relating to individuals and households, including contact information and pseudonymous data, many with a particular focus on marketing and advertising uses of such Personal Information.
  • As a result, regulators could allege that our practices do not comply with such laws or regulations, despite our ongoing efforts to comply.
  • These enforcement announcements signal increased ongoing regulatory scrutiny of advertising practices that involve “sensitive” categories of personal data such as health data and precise location information.
  • The FTC could expand this focus by acting on new authority to enforce a federal law focused on disclosures of certain information it classifies as sensitive by companies operating as data brokers to certain restricted countries or entities under the control of such countries.
  • Certain State Privacy Laws also require or will require companies to respond to user-enabled global privacy controls, such as a browser plug-in or privacy setting, device setting, or other mechanisms, that communicate or signal the consumer’s choice to opt-out of the sale or sharing of their Personal Information, or the use of their Personal Information for targeted advertising.
  • Lawmakers and regulators are also focused on data Processing by companies that do not have direct relationships with the consumers whose Personal Information they process.
  • Several states, including California and Texas, have enacted or updated laws restricting the activities of data brokers, and state attorneys general are keen to enforce these laws, such as by checking companies’ data broker registration status.
  • Beyond additional transparency requirements, beginning in August 2026, companies registered as data brokers in California must honor universal deletion requests consumers make of all data brokers via a deletion mechanism the state will create.
  • Beginning in 2028, data brokers must undergo audits verifying their compliance with the Delete Act.
  • The California Privacy Protection Agency recently released new regulations regarding the Delete Act’s data broker registration requirements including to revise the definition of “data broker.” These obligations may reduce the data available to Viant, require us to develop complex and expensive compliance tools and procedures, and may result in reductions in revenue.
  • Lawmakers, regulators, and advocates also continue to focus on activities involving the use of certain types of Personal Information perceived as especially sensitive, such as children’s data, health data, and location data, which will impact the advertising industry.
  • Related to consumer health information, MHMD introduced a host of new requirements covering a very broadly defined notion of consumer health data, including obligations on disclosures of such data that will impact the advertising industry.
  • Other states (e.g., Nevada) have enacted a similar law (though without a private right of action), and we expect more states will follow.
  • Additionally, plaintiffs have sought to apply federal wiretap and similar laws, such as the Federal Wiretap Act and Video Privacy Protection Act, and similar U.S. state laws, such as California’s Invasion of Privacy Act, to certain advertising and online tracking practices.
  • Such laws include private causes of action, and could be costly to settle or litigate, regardless of the merit of the claim, and may result in significant monetary liability.

and 71 more.

Sentence-level comparison of Item 1A in the two most recent 10-Ks (FY2024 ↗, FY2025 ↗). A reworded sentence counts as one dropped and one added, so heavy edits read as low “kept”. Headings and page furniture are stripped; nothing is summarised by a model.

Watch DSP. Know when insiders buy.
One email the day a filing lands. Free.