S&P 500 7,623.68 −0.52%
Nasdaq 25,955.34 −0.21%
S&P/TSX 35,788.18 −0.52%
Apple 347.73 −0.14%
Nvidia 210.96 −0.59%
Microsoft 524.51 +0.66%
Shopify 236.24 −0.07%
Royal Bank 281.77 −0.36%
CAD/USD 0.7134 −0.11%
PRE-MKT · 04:35 ET
Market ClerkRecap
Mon Oct 26 · pre-market1 signal on Oct 2494 insider buys this week · $48.3MCIRO short report next: Oct 31The week ahead

DERM

Journey Medical Corp
NASDAQ · HEALTH CARE · PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS
5.02
−0.07 −1.38%
USD · close Oct 23

A free account adds a watchlist, alerts when insiders, Congress or short sellers move on your tickers, and a morning brief. Sign up

How DERM rewrote its risk factors

10-K ITEM 1A · FY2024 → FY2025
Text kept
79%
of sentences unchanged
Added
92
new sentences
Dropped
73
sentences removed
Length
+601
words, now 26,336

New in FY2025

  • Also, a substantial portion of our sales derive from products that may become subject to third-party generic competition because their period of exclusivity has ended or they are without patent protection, subjecting them to the potential introduction of new competitor products and/or an increased market share of existing competitor products, either of which could have a significant adverse effect on our operating income.
  • A substantial portion of our sales derive from products that may become subject to third-party generic competition because their period of exclusivity has ended or they are without patent protection, subjecting them to the potential introduction of new competitor products and/or an increase in market share of existing competitor products, either of which could have a significant adverse impact on our operating income.
  • Section 505(b)(2), if applicable to us under the FDCA, would allow an NDA we submit to FDA to rely in part on data in the public domain or the FDA’s prior conclusions regarding the safety and effectiveness of approved compounds, which could expedite the development program for future product candidates by potentially decreasing the amount of clinical data that we would need to generate in order to obtain FDA approval.
  • If serious adverse events are identified during the development of any future product candidates, we may need to abandon or limit our development of these product candidates.
  • If any future product candidates are associated with undesirable adverse events, toxicities, or other negative characteristics, we may need to abandon such product candidates’ development or limit development to more narrow uses or subpopulations.
  • Such adverse events may affect patient recruitment or the ability of enrolled patients to complete the trial and could result in potential product liability claims.
  • Many compounds that show initial promise in early-stage testing are later found to be associated with adverse events that prevent further development.
  • If our clinical trials reveal severe or prevalent adverse events, our trials could be suspended or terminated, we may be unable to recruit patients and enrolled patients may be unable to complete the trials, and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities could issue a clinical hold, or order us to cease further development or deny approval of the product candidate.
  • Undesirable adverse events associated with any future product candidates could also result in the inclusion of unfavorable information in our product labeling, if approved, denial of regulatory approval by the FDA or other regulatory authorities for any or all targeted indications, and in turn prevent us from commercializing and generating revenues from the sale of such product candidate.
  • If one or more of our current products or any future product candidate receives marketing approval and we or others later identify undesirable adverse events associated with this product or any future product candidate, or we fail to comply with post-market regulatory requirements, a number of potentially significant negative consequences could result, including: ● regulatory authorities may require the addition of unfavorable labeling statements, specific warnings or a contraindication; ● regulatory authorities may suspend or withdraw their approval of the product, or require it to be removed from the market; ● we may be required to change the way the product is administered, conduct additional clinical trials or change the labeling of the product; or ● our reputation may suffer.
  • Any of these events could prevent us from achieving or maintaining market acceptance of any future product candidate or could substantially increase our development and commercialization costs and expenses, which could delay or prevent us from generating significant revenues.
  • The majority of states also have statutes or regulations similar to these federal laws, which apply to items and services reimbursed under Medicaid and other state programs, or, in several states, apply regardless of the payor; ● federal civil and criminal false claims laws and civil monetary penalty laws, including the federal False Claims Act, which impose criminal and civil penalties, including civil whistleblower or qui tam actions, against individuals or entities for knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, to the federal government, including the Medicare and Medicaid programs, claims for payment that are false or fraudulent or making a false statement to avoid, decrease or conceal an obligation to pay money to the federal government; ● HIPAA, which imposes criminal and civil liability for executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program or making false statements relating to healthcare matters; ● HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009, and their respective implementing regulations, which impose obligations on covered healthcare providers, health plans, and healthcare clearinghouses, as well as their business associates that create, receive, maintain or transmit individually identifiable health information for or on behalf of a covered entity, with respect to safeguarding the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information; ● the federal Open Payments program, which requires manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program, with specific exceptions, to report annually to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”), information related to “payments or other transfers of value” made to physicians, which is defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists, chiropractors, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, certified nurse anesthetists, certified nurse-midwives and teaching hospitals and applicable manufacturers and applicable group purchasing organizations to report annually to CMS ownership and investment interests held by the physicians and their immediate family members; ● U.S.
  • Specifically, the anti- bribery provisions of the FCPA prohibit the willful use of the mails or any means of instrumentality of interstate commerce corruptly in furtherance of any offer, payment, promise to pay, or authorization of the payment of money or anything of value to any person, while knowing that all or a portion of such money or thing of value will be offered, given or promised, directly or indirectly, to a foreign official to influence the foreign official in his or her official capacity, induce the foreign official to do or omit to do an act in violation of his or her lawful duty, or to secure any improper advantage in order to assist in obtaining or retaining business for or with, or directing business to, any person; enforcement actions may be brought by the Department of Justice or the SEC; legislation has expanded the SEC’s power to seek disgorgement in all FCPA cases filed in federal court and extended the statute of limitations in SEC enforcement actions in intent-based claims, such as those under the FCPA, from five years to ten years; ● Increased OIG scrutiny on the sale of our products through specialty pharmacies by means of direct investigation or by issuance of unfavorable Opinion Letters which may curtail or hinder the sales of our products based on risk of enforcement upon ourselves or our buyers; ● analogous state and foreign laws and regulations, such as state anti-kickback and false claims laws, which may apply to sales or marketing arrangements and claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by non-governmental third-party payors, including private insurers; state and foreign laws that require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government or otherwise restrict payments that may be made to healthcare providers; ● state and foreign laws that require drug manufacturers to report information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians and other healthcare providers or marketing expenditures; and ● state and foreign laws governing the privacy and security of health information in certain circum-stances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and often are not preempted by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts.
  • The ability to successfully commercialize any product candidate that receives marketing authorization depends in part on the extent to which coverage and reimbursement for these products and related treatments will be available from government health administration authorities, private health insurers and other organizations.
  • In the United States, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (the “Affordable Care Act”), was intended to broaden access to health insurance, reduce or constrain the growth of healthcare spending, enhance remedies against fraud and abuse, add transparency requirements for the healthcare and health insurance industries, impose new taxes and fees on the health industry and impose additional health policy reforms.
  • We expect that changes to the Affordable Care Act, the Medicare and Medicaid programs, changes allowing the federal government to directly negotiate drug prices and changes stemming from other healthcare reform measures, especially with regard to healthcare access, financing or other legislation in individual states, may result in more rigorous coverage criteria and in additional downward pressure on the price that can be charged for drug products.
  • In addition, on May 12, 2025, President Trump issued an executive order implementing the concept of most-favored nation pricing.
  • Under this order, the Department of Health and Human Services, in coordination with other federal agencies, is directed to take actions to ensure that the price of prescription drugs paid by federal health insurers, including Medicare and Medicaid, is in line with the prices paid in comparably developed nations.
  • As an alternative to the Affordable Care Act, President Trump recently announced the Great Healthcare Plan.
  • As presented, the plan is intended to lower drug prices by increasing competition and benchmarking U.S. drug prices to other countries, reduce insurance premiums by redirecting subsidies from insurers to individuals, increase accountability and transparency from insurers, and promote consumer choice by giving individuals more direct control over how healthcare dollars are spent.
  • Legislative and regulatory action will be required to fully implement the plan.
  • It is unclear how these proposed changes will impact our business and the pharmaceutical industry in general.
  • Additional federal, state and foreign healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future.
  • The implementation of any of the cost containment measures or other healthcare reforms discussed above may prevent us from being able to generate revenue, attain profitability or commercialize our products.
  • It is uncertain whether additional legislative changes will be enacted, or whether the FDA regulations, guidance or interpretations will be changed, or what the impact of such may be.
  • In addition, increased Congressional scrutiny of the FDA’s approval process, as well as staffing cuts effected at the FDA in early 2025, may significantly delay or prevent marketing approval, and the industry could become subject to more stringent product labeling and post-marketing testing and other requirements, any of which could have a material adverse impact on the development and commercialization of drug products.
  • Over the last several years, the U.S. government shut down several times and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA and the SEC, had to furlough critical employees and stop critical activities.
  • If a prolonged government shutdown occurs, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA to review and process any regulatory submissions we submit in a timely matter, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
  • Further, future government shutdowns could impact our ability to access the public markets and obtain necessary capital in order to properly capitalize and continue our operations.
  • Public concern regarding the safety of any of our products and any future product candidates could delay or limit our ability to obtain regulatory approval, result in the inclusion of unfavorable information in our labeling, or require us to incur additional costs.
  • The increased attention to drug safety issues may result in a more cautious approach by the FDA in its review of data from any clinical trials we may conduct.
  • If the FDA requires us to conduct additional preclinical studies or clinical trials prior to approving any other potential future product candidate, our ability to obtain approval of such product candidate will be delayed.
  • If the FDA requires us to provide additional clinical or preclinical data following the approval of any potential future product candidate, the indications for which such product candidate is approved may be limited or there may be specific warnings or limitations on dosing, and our efforts to commercialize potential future product candidate, if approved, may be otherwise adversely impacted.
  • Any of our future product candidates may not be effective, may be only moderately effective or may prove to be associated with undesirable or unintended adverse events, toxicities or other characteristics that may preclude us from obtaining marketing approval or prevent or limit commercial use.
  • The commercial success of our products or any future product candidates for which we receive marketing authorization will depend upon their acceptance by the medical community and coverage and reimbursement for our products by third-party payors, including government payors.
  • Market acceptance could be further limited depending on the prevalence and severity of any expected or unexpected adverse events associated with any future product candidates.
  • Risks Related to Our Reliance on Third Parties If we are unable to maintain sales, marketing, and distribution capabilities, or to enter into agreements with third parties to market and sell our current products or any future product candidates for which we receive marketing authorization, we may not be successful in generating revenues from selling and commercializing our current products and any future product candidates for which we receive marketing authorization.
  • We expect to rely on third parties to conduct any future preclinical studies and clinical trials, and those third parties may not perform satisfactorily, including by failing to meet deadlines for the completion of such trials or to comply with applicable regulatory requirements.
  • If we or any third party on which we rely fail to comply with applicable GCPs, the clinical data generated in our clinical trials may be deemed unreliable and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require us to perform additional clinical trials before approving our marketing applications.
  • We cannot assure you that any such regulatory authority, upon inspection of any future clinical trial, will determine that such clinical trial complies with GCP regulations.

and 52 more.

Gone since FY2024

  • Also, the majority of our sales derive from products that are without patent protection and/or are or may become subject to third-party generic competition, the introduction of new competitor products, or increased market share of existing competitor products, any of which could have a significant adverse effect on our operating income.
  • The majority of our sales derive from products that are without patent protection and/or are or may become subject to third-party generic competition, the introduction of new competitor products, or an increase in market share of existing competitor products, any of which could have a significant adverse impact on our operating income.
  • Section 505(b)(2), if applicable to us under the FDCA, would allow an NDA we submit to FDA to rely in part on data in the public domain or the FDA’s prior conclusions regarding the safety and effectiveness of approved compounds, which could expedite the development program for our product candidates by potentially decreasing the amount of clinical data that we would need to generate in order to obtain FDA approval.
  • If serious adverse or unacceptable side effects are identified during the development of any future product candidates, we may need to abandon or limit our development of these product candidates.
  • If any future product candidates are associated with undesirable side effects, toxicities, or other negative characteristics, we may need to abandon such product candidates’ development or limit development to more narrow uses or subpopulations.
  • Such side effects may affect patient recruitment or the ability of enrolled patients to complete the trial and could result in potential product liability claims.
  • Many compounds that show initial promise in early-stage testing are later found to cause side effects that prevent further development.
  • If our clinical trials reveal severe or prevalent side effects, our trials could be suspended or terminated, we may be unable to recruit patients and enrolled patients may be unable to complete the trials, and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities could order issue a clinical hold, or order us to cease further development or deny approval of the product candidate.
  • Undesirable side effects caused by any future product candidates could also result in the inclusion of unfavorable information in our product labeling, if approved, denial of regulatory approval by the FDA or other regulatory authorities for any or all targeted indications, and in turn prevent us from commercializing and generating revenues from the sale of such product candidate.
  • If one or more of our current products or any future product candidate receives marketing approval and we or others later identify undesirable adverse events or side effects caused by this product, or we fail to comply with post-market regulatory requirements, a number of potentially significant negative consequences could result, including: ● regulatory authorities may require the addition of unfavorable labeling statements, specific warnings or a contraindication; ● regulatory authorities may suspend or withdraw their approval of the product, or require it to be removed from the market; ● we may be required to change the way the product is administered, conduct additional clinical trials or change the labeling of the product; or ● our reputation may suffer.
  • Any of these events could prevent us from achieving or maintaining market acceptance of any current or future product candidate or could substantially increase our development and commercialization costs and expenses, which could delay or prevent us from generating significant revenues.
  • The majority of states also have statutes or regulations similar to these federal laws, which apply to items and services reimbursed under Medicaid and other state programs, or, in several states, apply regardless of the payor; ● federal civil and criminal false claims laws and civil monetary penalty laws, including the federal False Claims Act, which impose criminal and civil penalties, including civil whistleblower or qui tam actions, against individuals or entities for knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, to the federal government, including the Medicare and Medicaid programs, claims for payment that are false or fraudulent or making a false statement to avoid, decrease or conceal an obligation to pay money to the federal government; ● the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), which imposes criminal and civil liability for executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program or making false statements relating to healthcare matters; ● HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009, and their respective implementing regulations, which impose obligations on covered healthcare providers, health plans, and healthcare clearinghouses, as well as their business associates that create, receive, maintain or transmit individually identifiable health information for or on behalf of a covered entity, with respect to safeguarding the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information; ● the federal Open Payments program, which requires manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program, with specific exceptions, to report annually to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”), information related to “payments or other transfers of value” made to physicians, which is defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists, chiropractors, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, certified nurse anesthetists, certified nurse-midwives and teaching hospitals and applicable manufacturers and applicable group purchasing organizations to report annually to CMS ownership and investment interests held by the physicians and their immediate family members; ● U.S.
  • Specifically, the anti- bribery provisions of the FCPA prohibit the willful use of the mails or any means of instrumentality of interstate commerce corruptly in furtherance of any offer, payment, promise to pay, or authorization of the payment of money or anything of value to any person, while knowing that all or a portion of such money or thing of value will be offered, given or promised, directly or indirectly, to a foreign official to influence the foreign official in his or her official capacity, induce the foreign official to do or omit to do an act in violation of his or her lawful duty, or to secure any improper advantage in order to assist in obtaining or retaining business for or with, or directing business to, any person; enforcement actions may be brought by the Department of Justice or the SEC; legislation has expanded the SEC’s power to seek disgorgement in all FCPA cases filed in federal court and extended the statute of limitations in SEC enforcement actions in intent-based claims, such as those under the FCPA, from five years to ten years; ● Increased OIG scrutiny on the sale of our products through specialty pharmacies by means of direct investigation or by issuance of unfavorable Opinion Letters which may curtail or hinder the sales of our products based on risk of enforcement upon our-selves or our buyers; ● analogous state and foreign laws and regulations, such as state anti-kickback and false claims laws, which may apply to sales or marketing arrangements and claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by non-governmental third-party payors, including private insurers; state and foreign laws that require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government or otherwise restrict payments that may be made to healthcare providers; ● state and foreign laws that require drug manufacturers to report information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians and other healthcare providers or marketing expenditures; and ● state and foreign laws governing the privacy and security of health information in certain circum-stances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and often are not preempted by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts.
  • Our ability to successfully commercialize our products, or any future product candidate for which we receive marketing authorization, will depend in part on the extent to which coverage and reimbursement for these products and related treatments will be available from government health administration authorities, private health insurers and other organizations.
  • It is currently unknown what impact, if any, proposed changes by the federal and state governments in the U.S. and similar changes in foreign countries may have on pricing and reimbursement, particularly with respect to government programs such as Medicare and Medicaid.
  • In the United States, the Affordable Care Act was intended to broaden access to health insurance, reduce or constrain the growth of healthcare spending, enhance remedies against fraud and abuse, add transparency requirements for the healthcare and health insurance industries, impose new taxes and fees on the health industry and impose additional health policy reforms.
  • There have been significant ongoing judicial, administrative, executive and legislative efforts to modify or eliminate the Affordable Care Act.
  • Changes to and under the Affordable Care Act remain possible but it is unknown what form any such changes or any law proposed to replace or revise the Affordable Care Act would take, and how or whether it may affect our business in the future.
  • We expect that changes to the Affordable Care Act, the Medicare and Medicaid programs, changes allowing the federal government to directly negotiate drug prices and changes stemming from other healthcare reform measures, especially with regard to healthcare access, financing or other legislation in individual states, could have a material adverse effect on the healthcare industry.
  • We also expect that the Affordable Care Act, as well as other healthcare reform measures that have and may be adopted in the future, may result in more rigorous coverage criteria and in additional downward pressure on the price that we receive for our products and any future product candidates, if approved.
  • The effects of the IRA on the pharmaceutical industry in general are not yet known.
  • We expect that additional federal, state and foreign healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could limit the amounts that federal and state governments will pay for healthcare products and services, which could result in limited coverage and reimbursement and reduced demand for our products, once approved, or additional pricing pressures.
  • These and other healthcare reform measures that may be adopted in the future may result in more rigorous coverage criteria and in additional downward pressure on the price that we receive for any current product or future product candidate.
  • Any reduction in reimbursement from Medicare or other government healthcare programs may result in a similar reduction in payments from private payors.
  • The implementation of cost containment measures or other healthcare reforms may prevent us from being able to generate revenue, attain profitability or commercialize our products.
  • We cannot be sure whether additional legislative changes will be enacted, or whether the FDA regulations, guidance or interpretations will be changed, or what the impact of such changes on the marketing approvals of any future product candidates, if any, may be.
  • In addition, increased Congressional scrutiny of the FDA’s approval process may significantly delay or prevent marketing approval, as well as subject us to more stringent product labeling and post-marketing testing and other requirements.
  • We also do not know what impact any changes made by the new presidential administration will have on our business.
  • Such actions may impact the development and commercialization of drug products and could materially harm our business and financial condition Public concern regarding the safety of any of our products and any future product candidates could delay or limit our ability to obtain regulatory approval, result in the inclusion of unfavorable information in our labeling, or require us to incur additional costs.
  • The increased attention to drug safety issues may result in a more cautious approach by the FDA in its review of data from our clinical trials.
  • If the FDA requires us to conduct additional preclinical studies or clinical trials prior to approving any other potential future product candidate, our ability to obtain of such product candidate will be delayed.
  • If the FDA requires us to provide additional clinical or preclinical data following the approval of any potential future product candidate, the indications for which such product candidate is approved may be limited or there may be specific warnings or limitations on dosing, and our efforts to commercialize potential future product candidate may be otherwise adversely impacted.
  • Any of our future product candidates may not be effective, may be only moderately effective or may prove to have undesirable or unintended side effects, toxicities or other characteristics that may preclude us from obtaining marketing approval or prevent or limit commercial use.
  • The commercial success of our products or any future product candidates will depend upon their acceptance by the medical community and coverage and reimbursement for our products by third-party payors, including government payors.
  • Market acceptance could be further limited depending on the prevalence and severity of any expected or unexpected adverse side effects associated with any future product candidates.
  • Risks Related to Our Reliance on Third Parties If we are unable to maintain sales, marketing, and distribution capabilities, or to enter into agreements with third parties to market and sell our current products or any future product candidates for which we receive marketing authorization, we may not be successful in generating revenues from selling and commercializing any such product candidates.
  • We rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third parties to conduct any future preclinical studies and clinical trials, and those third parties may not perform satisfactorily, including by failing to meet deadlines for the completion of such trials or to comply with applicable regulatory requirements.
  • If we or any of our future clinical research organizations fail to comply with applicable GCPs, the clinical data generated in our clinical trials may be deemed unreliable and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require us to perform additional clinical trials before approving our marketing applications.
  • We cannot assure you that any such regulatory authority, upon inspection of any future clinical trial, will determine that such clinical trial complies with cGMP regulations.
  • If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties, meet expected deadlines or conduct our preclinical studies or clinical trials in accordance with regulatory requirements or our stated protocols, we will not be able to obtain, or may be delayed in obtaining, marketing approvals for any future product candidates and will not be able to, or may be delayed in our efforts to, successfully commercialize such product candidates.

and 33 more.

Sentence-level comparison of Item 1A in the two most recent 10-Ks (FY2024 ↗, FY2025 ↗). A reworded sentence counts as one dropped and one added, so heavy edits read as low “kept”. Headings and page furniture are stripped; nothing is summarised by a model.

Watch DERM. Know when insiders buy.
One email the day a filing lands. Free.