S&P 500 7,623.68 −0.52%
Nasdaq 25,955.34 −0.21%
S&P/TSX 35,788.18 −0.52%
Apple 347.73 −0.14%
Nvidia 210.96 −0.59%
Microsoft 524.51 +0.66%
Shopify 236.24 −0.07%
Royal Bank 281.77 −0.36%
CAD/USD 0.7134 −0.11%
PRE-MKT · 04:35 ET
Market ClerkRecap
Mon Oct 26 · pre-market1 signal on Oct 2494 insider buys this week · $48.3MCIRO short report next: Oct 31The week ahead

CNNE

Cannae Holdings, Inc.
NYSE · CONSUMER DISCRETIONARY · RETAIL-EATING & DRINKING PLACES
16.29
−0.14 −0.85%
USD · close Oct 23

A free account adds a watchlist, alerts when insiders, Congress or short sellers move on your tickers, and a morning brief. Sign up

MKT CAP $706.6MP/E —DIV YIELD 3.68%FCF YIELD -6.14%REV TTM $408.6M −30.5%NET INCOME −$167.8MNET CASH $500K52W 10.64 – 18.65SEC XBRL · TTM TO Invalid Date

How CNNE rewrote its risk factors

10-K ITEM 1A · FY2024 → FY2025
Text kept
58%
of sentences unchanged
Added
44
new sentences
Dropped
129
sentences removed
Length
−2,924
words, now 10,306

New in FY2025

  • Risks Relating to our Management Structure and Our Manager The Management Service Agreement was negotiated between related parties and the terms, including fees payable, may not be as favorable to us as if it were negotiated with an unaffiliated third party.
  • Because the Manager is owned by our Vice Chairman, Mr.
  • Foley, and in the past was also owned by certain of our directors and executive officers, the MSA and MSA Termination Agreement were developed by related parties, although our independent directors reviewed and approved both agreements.
  • The terms of the MSA and MSA Termination Agreement, including fees payable, may not reflect the terms we may have received if it was negotiated with an unrelated third party.
  • In addition, particularly as a result of our relationship with the present and past principal owners of the Manager, who are or were certain directors and members of our management team, our independent directors may determine that it is in the best interests of our shareholders not to enforce, or to enforce less vigorously, our rights under the MSA and MSA Termination Agreement because of our desire to maintain our ongoing relationship with our directors and executive officers.
  • Certain of our directors and executive officers are or were members of the Manager and are or were directors and executive officers of other companies.
  • Members of our management team may engage in activities that compete with us or our businesses.
  • While the members of our management team intend to devote a substantial majority of their time to the affairs of the Company, our management team is not expressly prohibited from investing in or managing other entities, including those that are in the same or similar line of business as our businesses, or required to present any particular acquisition or business opportunity to the Company.
  • Some of our Restaurant Group companies' competitors advertise on national platforms, which may provide customers with greater awareness and name recognition than our Restaurant Group companies can achieve through their advertising efforts.
  • The risk of cyberattacks could be exacerbated by geopolitical tensions, including the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, or other hostile actions taken by nation-states and terrorist organizations.
  • The occurrence of a natural disaster (or other extreme weather as a result of climate change or otherwise) or an act of terrorism, a decision to close the facilities without adequate notice, or other unanticipated problems could result in lengthy interruptions in Alight's services and solutions.
  • These potential developments include: • changes in regulations relating to health and welfare plans including potential challenges or changes to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, expansion of government-sponsored coverage through Medicare or the creation of a single payer system, or changes to the employee tax exclusion and/or employer deduction for employer-provided healthcare benefits; • changes in regulations relating to defined contribution and defined benefit plans, and Individual Retirement Accounts ("IRAs"), including retirement plan and pension reform that could decrease the attractiveness of certain of our retirement products and services to retirement plan sponsors and administrators or have an unfavorable effect on Alight's ability to earn revenues from these products and services; • changes in regulations relating to payroll processing and payments or withholding taxes or other required deductions; • additional requirements respecting data privacy and data usage in jurisdictions in which Alight operates that may increase its costs of compliance and potentially reduce the manner in which data can be used by Alight to develop or further its product offerings; • changes in regulations relating to fiduciary rules; • changes in federal or state regulations relating to marketing and sale of Medicare plans, Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D prescription drug plans; • changes to regulations of producers, brokers, agents or third-party administrators such as the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021, that may alter operational costs, the manner in which Alight markets or is compensated for certain services or other aspects of Alight's business; • changes to, or new, federal, state or provincial regulations relating to leave of absence programs or short-term or long-term disability plans, which could create more difficult and complex delivery requirements for Alight's business leading to increased operational costs or increased enforcement and litigation for potential violations, including greater penalties for administrative errors; and • additional regulations or revisions to existing regulations promulgated by other regulatory bodies in jurisdictions in which Alight operates.
  • Although an agreement has been reached for the sale of Premier League domestic broadcasting rights in the UK through the end of the 2028/29 football season, future agreements may not maintain the current level of broadcasting revenues.
  • The failure of a major media broadcaster for the domestic league competitions to pay outstanding amounts owed to its respective league could have a material adverse effect on BKFC's business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flow.
  • Risks Relating to JANA Changes in the value levels of equity, debt, real assets, commodities, foreign exchange or other asset markets, including from the impact of global trade policies and tariffs, may cause investments, revenue and earnings to decline.
  • JANA’s investment management revenue is primarily comprised of fees based on a percentage of the value of investments and, in some cases, performance fees which are normally expressed as a percentage of returns to the client.
  • Numerous factors, including price movements in the equity, debt or currency markets, or movements in the price of real assets, commodities, digital assets or other alternative investments in which JANA invests on behalf of its clients, including from the impact of global fiscal, monetary and trade policies, could cause the value of investments, or JANA's returns on investments, to decrease.
  • These risks may also be heightened by market volatility, illiquid market conditions or other market disruptions.
  • The occurrence of any of the above events may cause JANA’s investments, revenue and earnings to decline.
  • Poor investment performance could lead to the loss of clients and may cause AUM, revenue and earnings to decline.
  • The Company’s management believes that investment performance is one of the most important factors for the growth and retention of investments.
  • Poor investment performance relative to applicable portfolio benchmarks, aggregate fee levels or competitors may cause investments, revenue and earnings to decline as a result of: • Client withdrawals in favor of better performing products offered by competitors. • Client shifts to products that charge lower fees. • The diminishing ability to attract additional funds from existing and new clients • Reduced, minimal or no performance fees.
  • Regulatory reforms in the US could expose JANA to increasing regulatory scrutiny, as well as regulatory uncertainty.
  • In recent years, a number of regulatory reforms have been proposed or fully or partially implemented in the US, and the level of regulatory scrutiny to which JANA is subject has increased and could increase further in the future.
  • JANA, as well as its clients, vendors and distributors, have expended resources and altered certain of their business or operating activities to prepare for, address and meet the requirements that such regulatory reforms impose.
  • New or proposed changes to laws, regulations, policies, initiatives and other government actions may be difficult to anticipate, which provides additional uncertainty and may heighten the Company’s risks related to such actions.
  • Regulatory reforms in the US could require JANA to alter its future business or operating activities, which could be time-consuming and costly, increase regulatory compliance costs, result in litigation, impede the Company’s growth and cause its investments, revenue and earnings to decline.
  • Regulatory reform may also impact JANA’s clients, which could cause them to change their investment strategies or allocations in manners that may be adverse to JANA.
  • Based on these factors, we believe that we are not an investment company under the 40 Act, including by virtue of the exception from the definition of “investment company” in Section 3(b)(1) of the 40 Act, and we intend to continue to conduct our operations so that we will not be deemed an investment company.
  • Certain executive officers and members of our Board serve on the boards of directors of other entities or are employed by other entities, including but not limited to Alight, BKFC, JANA, CSI, Minden Mill and Watkins.
  • As a result of the foregoing, there may be circumstances where certain executive officers and directors may be subject to conflicts of interest with respect to, among other things: (i) our ongoing relationships with Alight, BKFC, JANA, CSI, Minden Mill or Watkins; (ii) business opportunities arising for any of us; and (iii) conflicts of time with respect to matters potentially or actually involving or affecting us.
  • General Risk Factors The loss of key personnel or directors could impair our operating abilities and could have a material adverse effect on our business, investments in operating companies, financial condition and results of operations.
  • Our success will substantially depend on our ability to attract and retain key members of our senior management team, officers and directors.
  • If we lose one or more of these key employees or directors, our operating results and in turn the value of our common stock could be materially adversely affected.
  • Although we may enter into employment or director agreements with our officers or directors, there can be no assurance that the entire term of any such agreement will be served or that any such agreement will be renewed upon expiration.
  • We utilize a third party to manage the Company's corporate IT network and related resources and we actively collaborate with the third party to monitor risks and recent threats to our IT environment, develop protocols for responding to cybersecurity incidents, and train employees on common techniques used in cyberattacks.
  • Furthermore, loss of our third-party IT service provider could result in increased costs associated with acquiring new internal IT resources and developing internal IT processes.
  • We currently have, and may continue to pursue, investments in businesses that involve or may involve business, regulatory, structural, legal, or other complexities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
  • We have investments in businesses that have complex structures.
  • This could take the form of substantial business, regulatory, structural, or legal complexity.

and 4 more.

Gone since FY2024

  • Risks Relating to our External Management Structure and Our Manager The Management Service Agreement was negotiated between related parties and the terms, including fees payable, may not be as favorable to us as if it were negotiated with an unaffiliated third party.
  • Because our Manager is owned by our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"), Mr.
  • Foley, and in the past was also owned by certain of our directors and executive officers, the Management Services Agreement was developed by related parties, although our independent directors reviewed and approved the Management Services Agreement.
  • The terms of the Management Services Agreement, including fees payable, may not reflect the terms we may have received if it was negotiated with an unrelated third party.
  • In addition, particularly as a result of our relationship with the present and past principal owners of the Manager, who are or were certain directors and members of our management team, our independent directors may determine that it is in the best interests of our shareholders not to enforce, or to enforce less vigorously, our rights under the Management Services Agreement because of our desire to maintain our ongoing relationship with our Manager.
  • Certain of our directors and executive officers are or were members of the Manager.
  • Our Manager and members of our management team may engage in activities that compete with us or our businesses.
  • While the members of our management team intend to devote a substantial majority of their time to the affairs of the Company, and while our Manager currently does not manage any other businesses that are in lines of business similar to our businesses, neither our management team nor our Manager is expressly prohibited from investing in or managing other entities, including those that are in the same or similar line of business as our businesses, or required to present any particular acquisition or business opportunity to the Company.
  • In this regard, the Management Services Agreement and the obligation thereunder to provide management services to us will not create a mutually exclusive relationship between our Manager, on the one hand, and the Company, on the other.
  • Our Manager can resign on 180 days’ notice, subject to a limited extension, and we may not be able to find a suitable replacement, resulting in a disruption in our operations that could materially adversely affect our financial condition, business and results of operations as well as the market price of our shares.
  • Our Manager has the right, under the Management Services Agreement, to resign at any time on 180 days’ written notice, whether we have found a replacement or not, subject to the Company’s right to extend such period by an additional 180 days or until a replacement manager has been in place for 30 days, if no replacement manager has been found by the 150th day following the Manager’s notice of resignation.
  • If our Manager resigns, we may not be able to contract with a new manager or hire internal management with similar expertise and ability to provide the same or equivalent services on acceptable terms within 180 days (subject to possible extension), or at all, in which case our operations are likely to experience a disruption; our financial condition, business and results of operations as well as our ability to pay distributions are likely to be adversely affected; and the market price of our shares may decline.
  • In addition, the coordination of our internal management, acquisition activities and supervision of our businesses is likely to suffer if we are unable to identify and reach an agreement with a single institution or group of executives having the expertise possessed by our Manager.
  • Even if we are able to retain comparable management, whether internal or external, the integration of such management and their lack of familiarity with our businesses may result in additional costs and time delays that could materially adversely affect our financial condition, business and results of operations.
  • Some of our Restaurant Group companies' competitors advertise on national television, which may provide customers with greater awareness and name recognition than our Restaurant Group companies can achieve through their advertising efforts.
  • Risks Relating to Dun & Bradstreet D&B faces significant competition for its solutions, which may increase as D&B expands its business.
  • D&B faces significant competition for its solutions.
  • D&B competes on the basis of differentiated solutions, datasets, analytics capabilities, ease of integration with its clients’ technology, stability of services, client relationships, innovation and price.
  • D&B's global and regional competitors vary in size, financial and technical capability, and in the scope of the products and services they offer.
  • Some of D&B's competitors may be better positioned to develop, promote and sell their products and services.
  • Larger competitors may benefit from greater cost efficiencies and may be able to win business simply based on pricing.
  • D&B's competitors may also be able to respond to opportunities before it does, by taking advantage of new technologies, changes in client requirements or market trends.
  • In addition, D&B faces competition from non-traditional and free data sources.
  • Many of D&B's competitors have extensive client relationships, including relationships with D&B's current and potential clients.
  • New competitors, or alliances among competitors, may emerge and gain significant market share.
  • Existing or new competitors may develop products and services that are superior to D&B's solutions or that achieve greater acceptance than D&B's solutions.
  • If D&B is unable to respond to changes in client requirements as quickly and effectively as its competition, D&B's ability to expand its business and sell its solutions may be adversely affected.
  • Additionally, D&B's competitors often sell services at lower prices than it does, individually or as part of integrated suites of several related services.
  • This may cause D&B's clients to purchase from its competitors rather than from D&B, which could result in reduced prices for certain solutions or the loss of clients.
  • Price reductions by D&B's competitors could also negatively impact its operating margins or harm its ability to obtain new long-term contracts or renewals of existing contracts on favorable terms.
  • Additionally, some of D&B's clients may develop their own solutions that replace the solutions they currently purchase from D&B or look to new technologies, which could result in lower revenue.
  • We believe that D&B's D-U-N-S Number and D&B's ability to link its data together with this unique identifier provides it with a strategic advantage by allowing for a global, end-to-end assessment of businesses throughout the world.
  • However, some of D&B's competitors and clients utilize their own unique identifiers, and clients have and may continue to adopt alternative standards to D&B's D-U-N-S Number and stop using D&B's solutions.
  • In addition, public and commercial sources of free or relatively inexpensive business information have become increasingly available and this trend is expected to continue.
  • To the extent the availability of free or relatively inexpensive business information increases, the demand for some of D&B's solutions may decrease.
  • If more clients adopt alternative standards to the D-U-N-S Number or look to these other sources of data, it could have a material adverse effect on D&B's business, financial condition and results of operations.
  • D&B also expect that there will be significant competition as it expands its business, and it may not be able to compete effectively against current and future competitors.
  • If it is unable to compete successfully, it could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.
  • A failure in the integrity of D&B's data, models, or the systems upon which it relies could harm its brand and result in a loss of sales and an increase in legal claims.
  • The reliability of D&B's solutions is dependent upon the integrity of the data in its global datastores as well as its models, including scores and other analytics.

and 89 more.

Sentence-level comparison of Item 1A in the two most recent 10-Ks (FY2024 ↗, FY2025 ↗). A reworded sentence counts as one dropped and one added, so heavy edits read as low “kept”. Headings and page furniture are stripped; nothing is summarised by a model.

Watch CNNE. Know when insiders buy.
One email the day a filing lands. Free.